Denigma

Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):

  • Variant effect: + -
    Longevity‑Associated (39)   No Age Effect (43)  
  • Study type: + -
    ‑ (1)   Candidate Region/Gene (53)   Meta‑Analysis (1)   Complete Mitochondrial Genome (1)   Mitochondrial Haplogroup (31)  
  • Variant type: + -
    Haplotype « 
    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types


    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    9 mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA haplogroup 0.38 0.025 98 vs. 117 — Chinese 90-100 years old J non-J - 18759861
    9296T,8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.55 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    9824C,10400T mtDNA — 0.955 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA — 0.311 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    A-3826G (rs1800592) - C-3740A UCP1 0.81 0.014 236 vs 741 — Italian >91 G-A — Candidate Region/Gene 21827845
    APOB XbaI − SI000565Q APOB — 0.006 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) — Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 X+ - Short X+ - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    APOE haplotype - rs1346044 APOE — 0.0001 175 vs 178 — Finn 100.8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 10069711
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90+ apoE4 — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90 apoE4 ApT4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90 apoE4 — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    APOE polymorphism APOE 3.26 0.001 64 vs 1344 — Italian 100+ e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 16960022
    APOE polymorphism APOE — 0.0001 291 vs 589 — Finn Mean age 97.5 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 16487435
    APOE polymorphism APOE 0.38 0.002 200 (cases) vs 539 — Italian >88 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    APOE polymorphism APOE — 0.437 1408 cases — Brazilian 69.3 +/- 7.2 — — Candidate Region/Gene 17934638
    APOE polymorphism - HP1/2 common polymorphism APOE — 0.013 200 (cases) vs 539 (initial) — Italian >88 e4-H2 (haplotype) — Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    C4B1 C4B — 0.05 77 (cases) vs 235 — Italian Mean age 101 — — Candidate Region/Gene 10219002
    Cdx2–GATA haplotypes VDR — 0.05 923 — Dutch Mean age 75.7 GG GA, AA Candidate Region/Gene 21051524
    D4a mtDNA haplogroups — 0.05 112 vs 96 — Japanese Minimum age 105 non-D4a D4a Complete Mitochondrial Genome 18545700
    e4 APOE 0.55 0.03 163 vs 1039 — Spanish 100+ e4 — Candidate Region/Gene 24534555
    e4 APOE 0.41 0.05 79 vs 597 — Italian 100+ e4 — Candidate Region/Gene 24534555
    e4 APOE 0.35 0.001 729 vs 498 — Japanese 100+ e4 — Candidate Region/Gene 24534555
    e4 APOE — 0.04 376 vs 376 — Canadian 85+ e4 — Candidate Region/Gene 24126160
    Haplogroup J — 0.38 0.025 98 vs 117 — Chinese 90–100 — — Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    HP 1/2 HP 1.27 0.0194 1072 total — Italian >88 HP*2 HP*1 Candidate Region/Gene 21147083
    HP*1 F/S HP 0.82 0.33 1072 total — Italian >88 — — Candidate Region/Gene 21147083

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o

    Suggest a new study Report a database issue