Denigma

Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):

  • Variant effect: + -
    Longevity‑Associated (1027)   No Age Effect (543)  
  • Study type: + -
    GWAS (2)   ‑ (27)   Candidate Region/Gene (784)   Meta‑Analysis (38)   Complete Mitochondrial Genome (2)   Whole‑Genome Linkage Scan (1)   Genome‑Wide Association Study (710)   Mitochondrial Haplogroup (36)   Mitochondrial genome (3)  
  • Variant type: + -
    SNP (572)   Locus (5)   Haplotype (87)   Other (1)   STR (11)   Deletion (5)   CNV (1)    (1)   VNTR (1)  
    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types


    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    rs3800358 BTBD9 — 0.00541 1173 vs 570 — American 85-100 — T Genome-Wide Association Study 22533364
    rs699947 VEGFA 1.43 0.008 166 vs 324 — Italian 85-99 (mean 89.8±2.8) C A Candidate Region/Gene 17574707
    −1190G/A VEGFA 1.39 0.014 166 vs 324 — Italian 85-99 (mean 89.8±2.8) G A Candidate Region/Gene 17574707
    -308G/A TNF 0.33 0.001 71 vs 99 — Mexican 86.2 G — Candidate Region/Gene 16269080
    ?60H LMP2 — 0.756 157 vs 311 — Italian 88+ H — Candidate Region/Gene 11772516
    ?145K LMP7 — 0.849 157 vs 311 — Italian 88+ K — Candidate Region/Gene 11772516
    rs2234693 ESR1 — 0.08 108 vs 85 — Italian 90+ PP (genotype) — Candidate Region/Gene 20819792
    rs2234693 - rs2234693 ESR1 — 0.12 108 vs 85 — Italian 90+ — — Candidate Region/Gene 20819792
    rs9340799 ESR1 — 0.22 108 vs 85 — Italian 90+ — — Candidate Region/Gene 20819792
    rs282070 MAP3K7 — 0.0011 288 vs 554 — Calabrian 90+, median 92 G — Candidate Region/Gene 22576335
    rs697739 ATXN1 0.59 8.97e-05 410 vs 553 — Italian 90–109 — — Genome-Wide Association Study 21612516
    H63D HFE — 1.0 35 vs 106 — 91-105 — — Candidate Region/Gene 11857056
    S65C HFE — 1.0 35 vs 106 — 91-105 — — Candidate Region/Gene 11857056
    HFE C282Y HFE — 7.2e-07 35 vs 106 — 91-105 (< 50 versus >90) C Y Candidate Region/Gene 11857056
    rs9456497 IGF2R 1.42 0.005 1089 vs 736 1613 vs 1104 Danish 92-93 years old A G Candidate Region/Gene 22406557
    rs9456497 IGF2R 1.42 0.005 1089 vs 736 1613 vs 1104 Danish 92.2–93.8 (mean age 93.2) A — Candidate Region/Gene 22406557
    rs1008438 HSPA1A — 0.005 157 vs 62 — Danish 92.8 A — Candidate Region/Gene 16804002
    rs1061581 HSPA1B — 0.04 157 vs 62 — Danish 92.8 A — Candidate Region/Gene 16804002
    rs1008438 HSPA1A — 0.005 157 vs 62 — Danish 92.8 A — Candidate Region/Gene 16804002
    rs1061581 HSPA1L — 0.04 157 vs 62 — Danish 92.8 A — Candidate Region/Gene 16804002
    rs9486902 FOXO3 1.40 0.0118 1089 vs 736 — Danish 92–93 C — Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs12206094 FOXO3 1.38 0.0076 1089 vs 736 — Danish 92–93 C — Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs2802292 FOXO3 1.34 0.0078 1089 vs 736 — Danish 92–93 T — Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs13220810 FOXO3 0.75 0.0223 1089 vs 736 — Danish 92–93 C — Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs2764264 FOXO3 — 0.05 1089 vs 736 — Danish 92–93 T — Candidate Region/Gene 20849522

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o

    Suggest a new study Report a database issue