Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    rs1327474 IFNGR1 (upstream) 1.07 5.4e-05 5974 (RS), 3267 (CHS), 3136 (FHS), 4511 (ARIC), 3219 (AGES), 902 (inCHIANTI), 620 (BLSA), 1661 (HABC), 1717 (SHIP) Whitehall II - 6000 (UK), English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (UK), Religious Order Study - 1100, Memory and Ageing Project American T Genome-Wide Association Study 21782286
    rs1008438 HSPA1A 0.009 894 total Italian 18-109 A C Candidate Region/Gene 16896546
    rs3800358 BTBD9 0.00541 1173 vs 570 American 85-100 T Genome-Wide Association Study 22533364
    rs361525 TNFa 0.156 See Description for details Italian Comparison 1: 66-91. Comparison 2: >88 Candidate Region/Gene 21865054
    rs1800629 TNFa 0.168 See Description for details Italian Comparison 1: 66-91. Comparison 2: >88 Candidate Region/Gene 21865054
    rs479744 FOXO3 0.05 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 (can't figure out using ensemble and NCBI) Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs3800231 FOXO3 1.26 0.0495 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 G Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs9398172 FOXO3 0.05 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 A Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs9400239 FOXO3 0.05 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 C Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs13217795 FOXO3 0.05 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 T Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs7762395 FOXO3 0.05 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 G Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs2764264 FOXO3 0.05 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 T Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs13220810 FOXO3 0.75 0.0223 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 C Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs2802292 FOXO3 1.34 0.0078 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 T Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs12206094 FOXO3 1.38 0.0076 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 C Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs9486902 FOXO3 1.40 0.0118 1089 vs 736 Danish 92–93 C Candidate Region/Gene 20849522
    rs648802 PERP 1.29 0.012 386 vs 410 541 vs 469 German 100 to 110, mean age = 101.3 C Candidate Region/Gene 20800603
    rs4880 SOD2 0.91 0.002 1650 Danish All danes born in 1905 (Danish 1905 cohort) T Candidate Region/Gene 19428448
    rs519007 FOXO3 0.93 0.55 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    rs479744 FOXO3 1.40 0.001 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    rs473268 FOXO3 1.21 0.044 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    rs1268170 FOXO3 1.24 0.02 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    rs3800231 FOXO3 1.42 0.0002 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    rs9400239 FOXO3 1.38 0.0007 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    rs7762395 FOXO3 1.38 0.005 388 vs 371 535 vs 553 German mean age 98.4 years Candidate Region/Gene 19196970
    • Page 1 of 5
    • 25 of 121 variants

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue