Browse


polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
mtDNA C150T 0.936 556 vs 403 Chinese 90–108 (94.59±3.34) Candidate Region/Gene 21262335
rs189037 ATM 0.004 875 vs 886 Chinese mean 94.6 CT Candidate Region/Gene 20816691
rs17630266 FOXO1 1.0 761 vs 1056 350 vs 350 Chinese mean age 102.3 Candidate Region/Gene 19793722
rs708272 CETP 0.068 523 vs 498 Chinese Mean age 93.4 Candidate Region/Gene 22336474
microsatellite polymorphism surrounded by rs2288377, rs5742612, and rs35767 IGF1 0.922 493 vs 425 Chinese (females ≥ 94; males ≥ 90 Candidate Region/Gene 20199671
rs2288377 IGF1 1.0 485 vs 392 Chinese 94.92 Candidate Region/Gene 18761080
rs5742612 IGF1 1.0 485 vs 392 Chinese 94.92 Candidate Region/Gene 18761080
rs35767 IGF1 1.0 485 vs 392 Chinese 94.92 Candidate Region/Gene 18761080
rs5749998 MAPK1 0.152 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
rs1892848 MAPK1 0.218 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
rs5999521 MAPK1 0.218 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
rs4646994 ACE 0.849 399 vs 302 Chinese >90 years Candidate Region/Gene 19502260
SI000565Q APOB 0.001 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 LL Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
rs11279109 - APOB XbaI APOB 0.001 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
rs11279109 - SI000565Q APOB 0.05 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - S D - M Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
APOB XbaI − SI000565Q APOB 0.006 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 X+ - Short X+ - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
rs11279109 - APOB XbaI - SI000565Q APOB 0.044 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ - Short I - X+ - Medium; D - X- - Long; D - X- - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.387 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.141 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
14979C,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.781 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.549 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.319 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9296T,8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.55 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
1107C,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.559 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.796 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 25 of 60 variants